Web Revenue Mistakes of Broadcast & Print

TV gets 10% of local online ad spends. Radio gets less than 2%. Newspaper shares are in decline. Compare these lowly numbers to online-only companies like Patch, Reach Local, and Google that are now getting over 50% of local ad budgets. Anybody in local media think that’s a problem that needs a little fixing? For sure, we bet the investment folks at Angelo Gordon and Oaktree Capital are getting a little un-easy about this issue.

All is not lost. Even though the local competition continues to grow stronger, Broadcasters and Newspaper can still get back in the game, and significantly grow their web & overall revenue share.

The solution is simple and indisputable: address and remedy the common web sales errors committed by most local media properties. The list below captures and identifies what we refer to as: the 800 lb. gorilla in the room.

1. Top management & owners need specialized web training. How can you manage what you don’t fully understand? Expensive research and consultants are not enough. Delegating sales strategy to a content & tech focused VP of Interactive or Internet manager is risky without knowledgeable oversight.

2. Dangerous thinking: ‘selling web cannibalizes traditional sales’. It’s crazy to think that these words are still being uttered. If those in charge would prefer to focus on their core product, that’s fine. If these managers believe that “web revenue is small, so let’s ignore it”….that’s fine too. But at the end of the day, if you’re not going run your web assets like a profit-first business…then why even have a digital initiative in the first place? Advertisers are moving more ad dollars to online. They can buy web from your reps, or someone else. While web revenue is still relatively small, it is the fastest growing revenue stream. At the very least, local media should focus on growing its overall revenue share, by smartly leveraging its digital assets.

3. Limited web training of sales reps. How can they sell new products without seasoned direction & regular training? Is your staff taught by qualified web-sales trainers, or by a ‘web-geek’? Is your staff forced to endure theory & classroom lecture, or are they getting real world training by being taught in the field? Local media needs to look outside of the industry for fresh and seasoned perspective on web sales. Be wary of training from those who do not have recent local/direct, web sales experience.

4. Management structure conflicts. Conflict #1: Web managers report to traditional managers whose compensation package favors spot or total sales. This may be one of the most critical choke-points of growing online revenue. Where do you think traditional managers will place most of their efforts? Conflict #2: Programming/editorial departments are primary operators of most websites, including where and how advertising is placed. If you would never allow the PD or editor determine your on-air spot load or ad volume, why do you allow them to determine online units and placements on the website? Just like your Radio station or Newspaper, the website must be ultimately run by those with ‘web profit & revenue first’ goals.

5. Poor attention to fast changing, online environment. Traditional media execs typically follow other traditional media execs for determining digital plans. Some harshly suggest it’s the blind leading the blind. with slipping shares of  local online revenue, it might be best to also look outside the industry for best practices in web sales. New competitors like Patch, Reach Local and Groupon are ramping up their local staffs, and are going after the budgets in your own backyard. Is your team familiar with these new players and their sales plan? How do you keep up? Do you have a plan to thwart these new competitors? One way to win is to provide Web 101 workshops to local advertisers. By taking an educational approach with clients, they’re more likely to rely on you for all of their marketing needs, and not some outsider.

6. Setting web budgets too low. This little sleight of hand allows your sales staff to quickly hit web goals. Once hit, they can push down web sales to a lower priority. In this situation, money is left on the table and gives corporate management the false impression of successful, local web selling. Making matters worse, this encourages the remaining local web budgets to be redirected to online-only companies. The only thing worse than this is the foolish trick of reps converting portions of the traditional buy to web, thereby teaching clients that web should always be viewed as a value-add.

7. In-effective inventory & yield management. Nothing says poor web-sales management than seeing a lame Google AD Sense or network ad on your home page. Geez, you can’t sell your most valuable, most powerful ad unit to a local sponsor? That’s like always placing per inquiry or PSA’s in your 7:20 stop set on a Monday morning. If more than 20% of your available web inventory is sold to 3rd party ad networks…your local sales strategy needs to undergo a crisis intervention…now.

8. Confusing media kits, sales packages & pricing. Local business owners prefer simple offers, delivered using advertiser-friendly vocabulary. They’re usually not sure of the value of 1 or even 10 million page-views. Excel spreadsheets with ad units, cpm’s and other confusing data only frustrates the advertiser. It also freaks out the sales rep who’s trying to clearly explain the features & benefits of a cross-platform marketing program. Simplicity is always best.

9. Director of Interactive; tech & content background only? Too few Interactive VP’s and web managers are qualified to implement a realistic revenue strategy. While building slick sites and driving eyeballs are quite important, these skills do not equal revenue & profit. Suggestion: hire a corporate VP of Interactive Revenue that reports directly to the CEO. Bonus all applicable staff based on web profit, not web traffic.

10. Over-reliance on vendors & research for sales strategy. Just because I sold you a beautiful kitchen & gave you the best cookbooks, doesn’t mean that you’re now a master chef !

Hyper Local Business Models 2010

Online advertising & digital investments are roaring back. Yet after substantial resource infusions, most local news sites and hyper-local initiatives are still struggling, or are shutting down. We recently found out why this is happening, and what the solution is to this online revenue issue. Both are simple and supported by historical evidence.

The early days of Newspaper giants such as James Gordon Bennett, E.W. Scripps and Joseph Pulitzer offered many clues that confirmed one of our earliest theories. (Hat tip to Howard Owens at The Batavian.com) These men were first and foremost, entrepreneurs and sales men. They clearly understood the need for immediate cash flow to support their journalistic efforts. They experimented with new technologies of the day, slaughtered a few sacred cows, and did whatever possible to quickly build a Newspaper business model that was self-sustaining, scalable, and NOT primarily supported by subscribers and donations.

Recently, we were approached by a group of investors looking to conduct a study on potential opportunities in the local online space. Of course they wanted intelligence on websites that showed significant editorial or traffic gains, as well as trends in local advertiser spend. But more importantly, they wanted a deeper look into the eco-system, projects & trajectories that could be considered un-discovered gems of ‘value creation’. In other words, projects of community interest that were combined with content, functionality, management teams & revenue potential…..worthy of investment.

Some findings of note:

  1. Out of 50 sites and companies that were in the study, only 6 were run by an executive, journalist, or Interactive VP with any significant sales or revenue focused background.
  2. A whopping 90% of sites we studied, primarily structured their web model from an editorial & technical perspective, with minimal revenue strategy baked in from the beginning. These sites combine technology & journalism to build readership traffic, which would then presumably attract advertisers. Advertiser support for these efforts were either limited or non-existent.
  3. Most sites are captained by journalists, pro-am bloggers, or executives with similar characteristics. Most came up through the newsroom, editorial/programming departments, or imported from Internet pure-plays
  4. Major sites run by larger organizations had a cadre of advisors and consultants that were intellectually seasoned and arguably first rate. Their board of directors were chock full of academics, journalists, futurists and research consultants. Yet, less than 10% of the sites we studied, had an advisor or board member with actual sales experience.

Initial recommendations from this study

  1. “Build it and they will come”  no longer works as well as it used to. Revenue needs to be primary consideration.
  2. Beware of using faulty data & research from sources with limited hands-on experience with ad community.
  3. The retro-fitting of revenue tactics into an online news model after reader traffic has been established, is an increasingly flawed strategy that is blindly followed by far too many online operations. While online news sites certainly must have smart editorial & content focused executives, our research strongly suggests the importance of placing a revenue focused exec, side by side with editorial, in order to work con-currently on the challenge.

Part 2 & 3 of this report includes greater detail and recommendation. Please email us for details.

Can Radio Build Hyper Local Web Business?

Ever taken a really good look at some Radio station websites? Aside from the layout and content, (some harshly call them a train-wreck) have you ever wondered how Radio can build a hyper-local business, and drive Internet revenue from these efforts?

Radio managers are knee-deep in these issues right now.

The pressure is on. While Radio’s primary revenue stream of selling spots has become much more challenging, there is an upside. Radio has the best of both worlds; on-air and online.

And it’s not just about selling banners and streaming spots. More importantly: Radio has ability to leverage it’s digital assets, to go after more of their client’s overall budgets. THAT’s a key distinction that separates the winners from the losers.

How can Radio seriously get into hyper-local game? First, it must admit that they need more outside help. Today, there are still too few people inside of the industry that have a handle on the fast changing digital landscape. Research, cool aps, and streaming will not be enough to get it done. And just relying on the local sales managers, or the GM’s to develop a strong web plan will only delay the pain of making a serious investment in hiring and re-training. Finding web-sales experts to help Radio will not be easy, but it will be necessary.

Pandora takes Beer Money from Radio

Pandora eating Radio’s lunch?

Pandora internet radioPandora is the leading online music site with a serious buzz….and major advertiser support from Planters, The History Channel and many others. Recently, Pandora threw a party at a local Philly hot spot. It was sponsored by Budweiser. Yes, the King of Beers re-allocated a nice chunk of their Philly marketing budget, and gave it to Pandora. They even had one of their online personalities (Kevin Seal) host the gig, and give away prizes. Sounds like a Radio appearance….right?

As a former DJ who has done his share of club appearances, I was blown away by the FREE BEER, tons of T-shirts, and other give-aways that Pandora and Budweiser provided. By comparison, more and more Radio club appearances consist of a ‘street team’; low paid interns that put up plastic banners, and hand out a t-shirt or two. Maybe.

Philly2niteMost beer marketing dollars used to go to Radio…..but this club event was solid proof that major sponsors looking to reach 20 somethings, are ramping up their LOCAL online spends. More of these budgets are being targeted to independent music/entertainment sites like Philly2Nite,……not terrestrial Radio.

Can Radio step up and build online platforms that can attract these dollars ? The answer is YES if they take more dramatic steps to hire for, train for, and invest in these types of online efforts. Simply re-purposing content and firing up the sales troops will not be enough. Can Radio managers handle this challenge?